One topic of conversation that’s been coming up between colleagues and me these past few months is the tarot decks we enjoy using and why we like to use them. Even this morning, a man who’s a fellow member of a Facebook tarot group and I had a chat about decks that really work for us. It turns out that we both honour the Feminine, so we like decks that have a sense of respect for Goddess, female teachers, and the Earth.
In addition to that, I find myself using countercultural tarot packs more often. That is, packs of cards that depict a way of living in our world that’s different than our culture’s current status quo. The cards of the Medicine Woman Tarot by Carol Bridges, in her words, “depict women of power and men of love living a life in balance”. The Gaian Tarot by Joanna Powell Colbert aims to provide images that “help create a culture of strong and gentle women and men, working together to create a beautiful, peaceful and just planet.” We’re inundated with images from the advertising industry that tell us we’re not good enough, smart enough, sweet-smelling enough, cool enough, or _______ enough. These exploitative advertisements, whether on TV, online, in publications, or on signs as we walk up the street, encourage us to consume, consume, consume without thinking about or thanking the source/s of these products. To spend time with healing imagery such as that in the decks mentioned above (and many others!) is an antidote to what we’re generally told. To contemplate and be inspired by tarot pictures that show people interacting with the more-than-human communities respectfully and create success in their lives while giving back to our planet helps us to wonder how we, too, might contribute to such a balanced culture and world.

I also enjoy decks whose court cards have been revisioned to take us out of hierarchical relationships (e.g. Page, Knight, Queen, and King) and show us a process instead. In Rachel Pollack’s Shining Tribe Tarot, these are called Place, Knower, Gift, and Speaker. The Gaian deck has Child, Explorer, Guardian, and Elder. Carol Bridges has revisioned them as Apprentice, Totem, Lodge, and Exemplar. All of these remind me that our relatedness with one another and with the larger world is not about power-over.

With regard to the Major Arcana, the big universal theme cards of the tarot, it doesn’t particularly matter to me whether a deck’s creator/creatrix groups them in any particular way. For me, life’s Larger Mysteries are beyond any particular grouping and each Trump stands on its own. However, I do like the Minor Arcana, the four suits that represent the everyday experiences of life, to have a sense of progression. One of the first serious tarot books I read many years ago, and which is still one of my primary texts, was/is Choice Centered Tarot by Gail Fairfield (now entitled Everyday Tarot). I also use her Choice-Centered Relating and the Tarot a lot. From Gail, I learned to think of each suit as a process, a journey from conception/beginning (Ace) through completion/releasing (King or its re-thought equivalent). So a pack of cards whose Minors progress logically, even story-like, through the fourteen values, make me a happy camper. As Carol Bridges says in the guidebook that accompanies the Medicine Woman Tarot, “There are fourteen stages (cards) through which every idea can evolve if it is to be taken to its highest conclusion.” In the Gaian Tarot, Joanna Colbert envisions each suit as having three mini dramas plus a transition point, then the people cards. You can see this sense of progression in Qabalistically rooted decks such as the Tarot of the Spirit by Pamela and Joyce Eakins, too. They follow the path of the Tree of Life as understood in the Western Mystery tradition. All of this to say that if a tarot deck’s suits/elements of life depict a natural flow or progression, it makes me (and my clients!) happy.

In short, if a tarot deck helps us to envision a life-sustaining culture, depicts process rather than hierarchy, and has suits whose order tells us a story that makes sense, it will likely end up living with me.
How about YOU? What are YOUR criteria for helpful tarot decks?

20 comments
Comments feed for this article
January 24, 2012 at 4:03 pm
La Vonne
I am totally in alignment with your deck preferences you and your colleagues mention. One that I also want to mention is Motherpeace. Also, Daughters of the Moon. These round decks honor the sacred feminine, something our modern culture seriously lacks. Check out my heavily researched blog I did on these two decks along with Pollack’s deck for a women’s studies professor in the Fall of 2010. http://www.lavonneparker.com/apps/blog
January 24, 2012 at 4:48 pm
jameswells
Cool and comprehensive article, LaVonne. Thank you for sharing it with us!
January 24, 2012 at 4:17 pm
diane heck
when i was about 25 years old, the deck that fell off the shelf for me at my local barnes and noble was The Enchanted Tarot, and I am still using that deck today, almost 20 years later even though the book and cards are looking a bit old. I enjoyed the colors and collage effect on the cards. Lately i also enjoy the Gaian Tarot for her world of nature and beauty and the Halloween Tarot for my favorite holiday. The problem is – I feel my first deck “knows” me best and sometimes don’t trust the others. Or maybe I just need more time with them. any thoughts?
January 24, 2012 at 4:51 pm
jameswells
It sounds like your Deep Self and the Enchanted Tarot have forged a solid relationship, Diane. Just as a relationship with another human can’t fulfill every one of our requirements for living, maybe the other two decks you have are like those friends, lovers, or colleagues who fulfill needs that the primary set of cards can’t. Just a thought.
January 24, 2012 at 4:40 pm
jameswells
By the way, there are many other decks that fit into one or more of these criteria. I used these as good examples.
January 24, 2012 at 4:42 pm
Fred
When I choose to add a new deck to my collection, it is usually for artistic reasons. There was something in the artwork, or idea that the creator/creatrix really captured. I love Zach Wong’s Revelation Tarot, and Joanna’s Gaian.
Although for clients, and public readings I tend to keep the imagery, closer to their ideas of what Tarot is, so I either use a Universal, or the Robin Wood Tarot.
January 24, 2012 at 4:49 pm
jameswells
Yes, the art is important, too, Fred. If a deck meets the other criteria, but is visually unappealing, it probably won’t come home with me. Oh dear, that almost sounded shallow.
January 24, 2012 at 5:05 pm
Deborah Outland
How interesting, James! In trying to decide if I had additional criteria (I like the ones you mentioned), I would add beauty of artwork. Having said that, my favorite deck for years was the MotherPeace deck, which I think far from traditionally “beautiful”!
Another far more important criterion would be that they are non-judgmental… That goes farther than getting rid of the hierarchical in the court cards, and gender stereotypes in the majors. It’s a less “black and white” attitude in the way things are depicted. As a specific example the Gaian Bindweed card is so much more the way I think of the Devil than other depictions I’ve seen. It’s not that it’s not as “bad” a devil so much as that it captures the essence that we create our own suffering through our thoughts, rather than from some outside “bogey-man” we have to avoid outside ourselves.
Closely related to this is a lack of rigidity. There are many ways to express concepts, each of which carries it’s own connotations and nuances. Decks which conform to the exact sysbols from Rider-Waite-Smith or another older deck, seem stuck in an old and overly-well-defined pattern. Depicting the card in a new light gives the concepts shown room to breathe, evolve, and provide different symbols which may be more meaningful (hopefully) than the old prescribed set. Nothing disappoints me in a deck more than seeing that it is just another RWS knock-off that simply redraws the same old scenes in a different art style and color scheme!
Finally I am so thrilled to see your mention of Gail Fairfield and her wonderful books! I had the privilege of being in a class she taught while she was developing her “Choice Centered Relating” book, and she has had a huge influence on my Tarot reading in many ways! She’s an awesome teacher and reader!
January 24, 2012 at 6:17 pm
jameswells
Gail has been a prime mover and shaker for me for a long time, Deborah! I get a personal session from her once a year and I use many, many of her concepts not only when I work with tarot, but in life. I’d love to chat with you some time (phone or email) about your experiences in her class.
Beauty of artwork definitely counts! Just because a deck is well-structured doesn’t necessarily make it useable. There’s one deck I had (it shall remain nameless here) whose structure seemed to make great sense, but it was so bland that I just couldn’t use it. I ended up trading it for another one. The person with whom I traded *loved* hir new prize. Fine by me, it wasn’t staying in my home.
RWS look-alikes can be disappointing, can’t they? That said, I appreciate certain aspects of tradition with an added flare. I think that’s why the Gaian Tarot speaks so loudly to me and to others. The structure and the tradition are in place (with certain subtle references to Motherpeace and RWS from time to time), and it pulses with that countercultural energy I love. Motherpeace is wonderful for its primal, to-the-Deep-Self artwork. Great stories in each picture even though some people argue that it’s not a traditional tarot deck. That was the point!
I’m glad you mentioned the devil/bindweed thing, Deborah. For me, every card is essentially neutral and the nature of each question slants a card one way or another (can you tell that Gail got to me early on?). Not buying into certain religious values, I don’t believe in a “devil”, but I do believe that we can limit ourselves and/or create helpful structures.
January 24, 2012 at 8:24 pm
Deborah Outland
I’m not sure I’d advocate throwing out all the references to RWS, either! I just don’t like decks that are simply reworks of the same old things. If the 3 of Swords is a heart with 3 swords through it, though, I am nearing eye roll territory!
After some further consideration, I think that both the rigidity and non-judgement issues I mentioned above are both ways I see that the deck can better express that “neither bad nor good” concept, and yes, indeed, that is Gail to a “t”! It’s hard for me to feel like the 9 of Swords should really be the “nightmare” card, for example. I mean, I find that pretty definitely intrinsically negative. To re-frame that card into something that “just is”, It almost seems like you have to do something to re-vision that image as well as rework the meaning.
I would love to tell you a couple of stories about that class–it was an important turning point for me! Drop me an email note so I’ll have your address, and I’ll tell you the tale(s). I do indeed see a great deal of commonality between you and Gail in many ways! One thing that has always served me well from Gail and her class was her insistence on reading the card, NOT just saying what you thought the person ought to do. To me, that one habit she instilled is worth far more than any specific skill I’ve ever learned about Tarot!
January 26, 2012 at 2:03 pm
jameswells
I’m with you on the 3S thing, Deborah. In James Land (it’s an interesting place!), a card simply *is*, as you suggest, just as an experience in life just *is*. Our own contexts and imaginations give the event or the card meaning. The whole context piece (always interpret the card in light of the position, period!) is possibly the most valuable piece I’ve gotten from Gail. That’s what gives my sessions their specificity. So many times, I’ve heard readers drone on about “Go and do yoga” (I don’t get along with yoga) or “You just need to pray to Archangel Michael” (not part of my personal practice, so why would I do it?) instead of just paying attention to the topic and the question/position in concert with the card that’s laid in that position. One reason I generally don’t get readings from other people, except for my once-a-year check in with GF. I trust myself most. And I don’t mean that in an arrogant way. I’ll drop you a note and we’ll chat!
January 24, 2012 at 5:30 pm
mystereum
Great article, James. I always naturally drive in from the visual story perspective, how the deck embraces its own particualr voice and tenor of divination. When the visual story is evocative, not necessarily pretty or complex, it sparks me to want to work with the cards and as well listen to the verbal story in any companion material. Regardless of the tradition of the deck, RWS, Thoth, Marseilles similar or clone . . . decks such as Rachel Pollack’s Shining Tribe that carry a deceptive simplicity much like the Marseilles strike the clearest chords of resonance that get my attention.
In regards to masculine and feminine decks, I resonate with both, and prefer masculine decks that have a hearty and natural affinity with integral feminine qualities. And, by masculine I lean towards the gentleness born from strength, openness from awareness . . . decks that speak almost as if seeing with cat’s ears. Rather than that being a candy-coated projection, if a deck churns my stomach, it fits that bill — and that as with anything will have its limits — for example if a deck spoke like one of the “Saw” movies, it would never come home with me.
January 24, 2012 at 6:10 pm
jameswells
Great thoughts, Jordan. Simplicity works nicely. In fact, a pips-only deck can really keep me focused on the suit/element and value components of tarot, giving me fresh, personal interpretations for the readee. The Camoin-Jodorowsky verion of the Marseilles deck fits that bill as does the Ukiyoe Tarot.
Ultimately, I experience masculine and feminine as qualities or energies rather than as something about gender-specific body parts. That’s why I like Joanna Colbert’s expression, “strong and gentle women and men”. I agree that the story needs to be evocative, whatever that looks like in a particular set of cards.
January 24, 2012 at 6:09 pm
Lunaea
Good food for thought, as always, James. For me, the King and Queen court cards don’t just speak of power-over, but can also speak of power-with. To be a queen among queens is to inspire others by example to expand to their fullest potential. They also speak to me of power-from-within, drawing on our inborn sovereignty and nobility to serve those who are in need of our gifts and skills. I love decks that re-envision the courts (and have done some myself!), but for me, there is still value in the traditional courts as well, as exemplars for stages of human development.
January 24, 2012 at 6:22 pm
jameswells
Well said, sister! Primus inter pares (first among equals), as they say, reminds us that each of us is a leader in some way. The Berkana Institute defines a leader as anyone who steps forward to do what needs to be done for hir world in the moment (I’m paraphrasing). What you wrote here reminds me of that. Thank you!
January 24, 2012 at 7:05 pm
gayle
Terrific article! I really like your thoughtful response to Diane as well. I’ve been completely hooked on the Mythic Tarot for years due to the story telling aspect of the myths and each minor being part of a progression. The brilliant blog Tarot Elements showed me the importance of comparative tarot. Seeing all the readers respond to the variety of decks made me open my heart towards something I was missing in my own readings by using a limited deck. Sometimes it just takes time for a deck to show you what it’s all about. The Gaian Tarot is earthy yet so modern I’m amazed by what it conveys.
Thanks sharing your ideas~
January 26, 2012 at 1:56 pm
jameswells
Thank you for joining the discussion, Gayle. The Mythic Tarot (both versions) is a very good example of a continuous story through each suit. I enjoy that each of its suits is a classic myth (e.g. the Cups tell the story of Eros and Psyche). Chime in any time here!
January 29, 2012 at 3:52 pm
You are welcome to use any Tarot deck to experience the Free 1 to 1 Tarot Coaching « Contemporary Tarot Association
[...] Criteria for Favourite Tarot Decks (jameswells.wordpress.com) [...]
February 4, 2012 at 2:32 pm
woley
I love threads like this because I love to speak about cards, they are a passion of mine.
I started with the Zerner Farber, which is a borderless, compact version of the Enchanted, so I completely get Carol’s comment. Also the 3 of Swords kitsch with the stabbed heart is a bugaboo of mine—can’t stand it, so enjoyed Deborah’s similar ideas on that and yours James.
For me the progression of cards is a spontaneous, chaotic one so court cards and order and dogmatic or formulaic relationship and numerology does not appeal to me. Other people love it—we all have different minds.
I name my cards in my own way. The Knight of Pentacles is “Old Stodgy” to me. The 2 of Swords is “The Parlay Card”. As far as genders go I have some feminine-based decks but I feel they lack the balance of reality; the reality of life is that we live with two genders not one. I understand the backlash against patriarchy and domination, but there are TWO genders. Observation, reality, inclusiveness is important if you want the whole experience of wisdom.
For me the main criterion is artwork, if I like it. There is a subtext within artwork, words within art and symbolism, that appeals to me so I find too much personal philosophy by the artist off-putting. I like to find it myself. People complain about an author’s “agenda” quite a bit, which I don’t mind as long as it doesn’t overwhelm the art. I like to see my own answers.
The marvelous “Wheel of Change Tarot” by Alexandra Genetti often gets bashed for her environmental stance. I love that deck as I live in the country and see the changes in nature and the environment constantly, plus her artwork is great. I also think artists and authors have things to say which is the impetus for creating a deck. Some people overwhelm with proselytizing—I don’t care for it because you lose the facets inherent in tarot then.
History is a major criterion for me, next to art. I like to learn about things and history, or sociology and cultural history are a big draw for me. I have a few campy decks just for fun because I like the colour or artwork, but I need something to feed my mind, I like a bit of depth to cards.
February 4, 2012 at 3:09 pm
jameswells
The Wheel of Change Tarot is a glorious pack of cards! I got it not long after it was first published. I love the earth-honouring vibe, the respect for many races, the gender balance, and the colourful artwork. AG did a great job depicting her stance while keeping it universal, as far as I’m concerned.
The personalised naming of cards is a great idea and a fun way to remember what each card is for you. Must try that with one of my decks.
I don’t mind an author’s agenda as long as I get an idea of some form of progression or story that helps me to understand more clearly what message s/he is conveying. I’m leary, however, of an artist’s/author’s projected stuff getting in they way too much. Every card shouldn’t depict, let’s say, some aspect of the creator’s/creatrix’s beastly mother or perfect son.
It’s great to bring other disciplines and subjects into our tarot studies and decks, otherwise it could get boring. Gives us so many more reference points and memory aids.
Thank you for your contribution to the discussion, Woley!